//--> How long should I wait for a response from the journal? All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. If a paper was considered insufficiently novel or interesting to merit high-profile publication, we are unlikely to reconsider simply because the authors disagree. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. These are very political journals. What could this mean? Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. Share your stories! The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information such as conflicts of interest and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. "Advice please! A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). How do I align things in the following tabular environment? How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. A decision by the editor in chief is the . Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". It only takes a minute to sign up. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. Thanks! What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? on 05 Apr, 2021. After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. Help us improve this article with your feedback. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. . After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. If so, how close was it? Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. I am currently continuing at SunAgri as an R&D engineer. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. Either rejection or sending it out for review. Internet Explorer). The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. ]]> In my experience rejection is quite rapid - 48 hours or so. Sometimes they are more busy. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. You can appeal to the editorial board, giving a point-by-point argument against the editors views. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. . Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. In a perfect world, we would consult with dozens of experts, who would spend many hours considering every point in the manuscript. This will reduce delays. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. and JavaScript. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Dont infer anything from unavailable data. . Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. #AcademicChatter" ii a. I gave them his address. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). [CDATA[> Peer review comments, cover letter and more. Deciding when or whether you should write a rebuttal, determining what steps you should take next if you choose the . The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. Press J to jump to the feed. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Experiments gone wrong? We understand your anxiety :-) However, the. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. Did you find it helpful? What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. Yes b. I regret giving them his address. Stage 2: Editor assigned. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. good . I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. [CDATA[// >